1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 605 A.2d
  5. 605 A.2d 600 (1992)
 

IN RE KENNEDY

No. 91-783.

605 A.2d 600 (1992)

In re Thomas F. KENNEDY, Respondent.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided March 27, 1992.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David Epstein, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Elizabeth A. Herman, Asst. Bar Counsel, with whom Wallace E. Shipp, Acting Bar Counsel, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for the Office of Bar Counsel.

Joan L. Goldfrank, Washington, D.C., entered an appearance, for the Bd. on Professional Responsibility.

Before WAGNER and KING, Associate Judges, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.

PER CURIAM:

In this disciplinary case, the Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board) found that respondent, Thomas F. Kennedy, violated Disciplinary Rule 3-101(B) (prohibiting the practice of law in a jurisdiction where to do so violates regulations of the profession in that jurisdiction). The Board recommended a sanction of suspension for nine months with the requirement that respondent furnish proof of fitness as a condition of reinstatement. Respondent argues...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases