1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 95 N.J.
  5. 95 N.J. 105 (1984)
 

PEREZ v. PANTASOTE, INC.

95 N.J. 105 (1984)

469 A.2d 22

MIGUEL PEREZ, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. PANTASOTE, INC., RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided January 17, 1984.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George J. Kenny argued the cause for appellant (Connell, Foley & Geiser, attorneys; Kathleen S. Murphy, on the brief).

Robert S. Sirota argued the cause for respondent (Goldstein, Ballen, O'Rourke & Wildstein, attorneys).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by SCHREIBER, J.

This case presents for our review the interpretation of the newly adopted provision of the Workers' Compensation Act, defining for the first time what constitutes "[d]isability permanent in quality and partial in character." N.J.S.A. 34:15-36 (West Supp. 1983-84). The pertinent issues arose in a workers' compensation proceeding instituted by the petitioner, Miguel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases