1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 713 S.E.2d
  5. 713 S.E.2d 772 (2011)
 

STATE v. KING

No. COA10-1237.

713 S.E.2d 772 (2011)

STATE of North Carolina v. Melvin Charles KING.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

August 2, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Attorney General Roy Cooper , by Asst. A.G. Anne M. Middleton , for the State-appellant.

VanCamp, Meacham & Neuman, PLLC, Pinehurst, by Patrick Mincey , and Eddie Meacham , for defendant-appellee.

BRYANT, Judge.

Where the trial court concluded, pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 8C-1, Rule 403, that the probative value of the evidence sought to be admitted—expert testimony regarding repressed memory—was outweighed by the prejudicial effect of the evidence, confusion of issues, or misleading the jury, we find no abuse of discretion and affirm the trial court's grant of defendant's motion to suppress.

Facts and Procedural History...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases