KLEINSCHMIDT v. CITY OF LEWISTON

No. A11-109.

David Kleinschmidt, Relator, v. City of Lewiston, Respondent, Department of Employment and Economic Development, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed August 15, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David P. Jendrzejek , Moss & Barnett, A Professional Association, Minneapolis, Minnesota (for relator).

Jennifer A. Gumbel , Springer & Gumbel, P.A., Preston, Minnesota (for respondent).

Lee B. Nelson , Amy R. Lawler , Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development, St. Paul, Minnesota (for respondent department).

Considered and decided by Wright, Presiding Judge; Shumaker, Judge; and Connolly, Judge.


UNPUBLISHED OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Relator challenges the decision of an unemployment-law judge (ULJ) that he is ineligible to receive unemployment benefits because he was discharged for employment misconduct. Because substantial evidence in the record shows that relator committed employment misconduct by providing misleading and evasive information to his employer, we affirm.

FACTS

The City of Lewiston employed relator David Kleinschmidt...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases