1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RAMOS v. NEUMANN
 

RAMOS v. NEUMANN

No. 09-56981.

PEDRO RAMOS, CATALINA RAMOS, as an individual and as Guardian Ad Litem for K.R., minor; THE FAIR HOUSING COUNSEL OF SAN DIEGO, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. FRITZ NEUMANN, DBA El Camino 76 Mobile Estates; G. N. SELLERS, III, DBA N.A.P. Consulting Inc.; ADELE TEAL, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed March 1, 2011.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM*

Plaintiffs-Appellants Pedro and Catalina Ramos ("the Ramoses") appeal on behalf of themselves and their minor daughter, K.R., the district court's judgment that Defendants-Appellees ("Neumann") did not violate the Ramoses' rights to "reasonable accommodation" under the Fair Housing Act Amendments ("FHAA"), 42 U.S.C. § 3604(f), when they refused to permit the Ramoses to install a trampoline...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases