BAILEY, VAUGHT, ROBERTSON AND CO. v. REMINGTON INVESTMENTS, INC.

No. 05-93-00911-CV.

888 S.W.2d 860 (1994)

BAILEY, VAUGHT, ROBERTSON AND COMPANY, Appellant, v. REMINGTON INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Texas, Dallas.

September 27, 1994.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William E. Bailey, Dallas, for appellant.

Leslie K. Kalmbach, Bruce H. Clark, Austin, for appellee.

Before MALONEY, OVARD and BURNETT, JJ.


OPINION

OVARD, Justice.

Bailey, Vaught, Robinson and Company (BVR) appeals a judgment in favor of Remington Investments, Inc. (Remington) in this suit on a promissory note. In three points of error, BVR contends the trial court erred in (1) holding that Remington was a holder in due course, (2) granting Remington's motion for summary judgment and ordering that BVR take nothing on its counterclaims, and (3) denying BVR's motion for continuance. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases