| Leagle, Inc. is dedicated to making legal content and the knowledge contained therein more accessible and discoverable than ever before – anytime, anywhere, for anyone, through innovative, relevant web-based and mobile-media solutions. |
|
© Leagle, Inc. The Leagle.com website is intended to inform and keep readers abreast of developments in the law. It is not to be used or relied upon as a substitute for professional advice. Before acting on any legal matter, readers should discuss the situation with their own professional advisers. For further information, please see our Terms of Use. |
- U.S. v. Arizona (Re: Immigration law) (See related news)
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. Cottrell (Re: Injunction for timber salvage sale)
- In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation
- State v. Jeffs (Re: Polygamist leader Warren Jeffs) (See related news)
- Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Re: Accomodating a customer's disability)
- Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. City of New York (Re: NYC policy on taxicab owners buying fuel-efficient hybrids)
- Sanofi-Aventis v. FDA (Re: Licensing of the anit-cancer drug oxaliplatin marketed as Eloxatin)
- Ostergren v. Cuccinelli (Re: Virginia's privacy act and publishing Social Security numbers online)
- Voices v. Chu (Re: Environmental consequences of 'clean coal' tax credits)
- USA v. Caracappa (Re: RICO convictions of NYPD 'Mafia Cops') (See related news)
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc. (Re: Bratz dolls copyright case) (See related news)
- Wine Country Gift Baskets.com v. Steen (Re: Home delivery of wine in Texas)
- State v. McGuire (Re: Sexual abuse conviction of a former Jesuit priest) (See related news)
- Wisconsin Medical Society, Inc. v. Morgan (Re: Malpractice fund used for state budget) (See related news)
- Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8 (Re: Court on picketing by a union)
WHITE v. DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE
LEROY WHITE, Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE JUSTICE and DIVISION OF RISK MANAGEMENT, Appellees.
Case No. 1D09-6408.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Opinion filed March 10, 2010.
Leroy White, pro se, Appellant.
Kimberly J. Fernandes of Kelley, Kronenberg, Gilmartin, Fichtel, Wander, Bamdas, Eskalyo & Dunbrack, P.A., Miami Lakes, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant has failed to respond to this court's order to show cause dated December 29, 2009. This court's order specifically warned Appellant: "Failure to timely comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, which may include dismissal of the appeal, without further opportunity to be heard. Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.410." By notice of appeal filed December 21, 2009, Appellant seeks review of an order rendered June 19, 2007. Accordingly, we DISMISS this appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See § 440.25(5)(a), Fla. Stat. (2006) (providing that orders of judges of compensation claims "shall become final 30 days after mailing of copies of such order to the parties" unless timely appealed); Fla. R. App. P. 9.180(b)(3) (providing this court's jurisdiction is invoked if notice of appeal is filed within thirty days of rendition of order to be reviewed); see also, e.g., Metellus v. State, 900 So. 2d 491, 495 (Fla. 2005) (noting jurisdictional rule cannot be altered by court or by agreement of parties); Troche v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc., 954 So. 2d 685, 686 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) ("It is well settled that to be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed in the appropriate court within the appropriate time period."); Metro. Dade County v. Vasquez, 659 So. 2d 355, 356 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing untimely appeal for lack of jurisdiction). All pending motions are denied as moot.
VAN NORTWICK, LEWIS, and ROWE, JJ., CONCUR.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED.
This copy provided by Leagle, Inc.
| x | |





