| Leagle, Inc. is dedicated to making legal content and the knowledge contained therein more accessible and discoverable than ever before – anytime, anywhere, for anyone, through innovative, relevant web-based and mobile-media solutions. |
|
© Leagle, Inc. The Leagle.com website is intended to inform and keep readers abreast of developments in the law. It is not to be used or relied upon as a substitute for professional advice. Before acting on any legal matter, readers should discuss the situation with their own professional advisers. For further information, please see our Terms of Use. |
- U.S. v. Arizona (Re: Immigration law) (See related news)
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. Cottrell (Re: Injunction for timber salvage sale)
- In re: Katrina Canal Breaches Litigation
- State v. Jeffs (Re: Polygamist leader Warren Jeffs) (See related news)
- Antoninetti v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (Re: Accomodating a customer's disability)
- Metropolitan Taxicab Board of Trade v. City of New York (Re: NYC policy on taxicab owners buying fuel-efficient hybrids)
- Sanofi-Aventis v. FDA (Re: Licensing of the anit-cancer drug oxaliplatin marketed as Eloxatin)
- Ostergren v. Cuccinelli (Re: Virginia's privacy act and publishing Social Security numbers online)
- Voices v. Chu (Re: Environmental consequences of 'clean coal' tax credits)
- USA v. Caracappa (Re: RICO convictions of NYPD 'Mafia Cops') (See related news)
- Mattel, Inc. v. MGA Entertainment, Inc. (Re: Bratz dolls copyright case) (See related news)
- Wine Country Gift Baskets.com v. Steen (Re: Home delivery of wine in Texas)
- State v. McGuire (Re: Sexual abuse conviction of a former Jesuit priest) (See related news)
- Wisconsin Medical Society, Inc. v. Morgan (Re: Malpractice fund used for state budget) (See related news)
- Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 8 (Re: Court on picketing by a union)
M.B. v. AGENCY FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES
M.B., Appellant,
v.
Agency for Persons with Disabilities, Appellee.
No. 3D09-962.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.
Opinion filed January 27, 2010.
Dana M. Gallup (Hollywood), for appellant.
John D. C. Newton, II, General Counsel, and Jonathan D. Grabb (Tallahassee), Agency for Persons with Disabilities, for appellee.
Before RAMIREZ, C.J., and ROTHENBERG, J., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.
This is an appeal from a final administrative order in favor of the Florida Agency for Persons with Disabilities, upholding its partial denial and reduction of services which had been provided to M.B. for 2008. The ALJ hearing and its result occurred before our decision in M.B. v. Agency for Persons with Disabilities, 13 So. 3d 509 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009), which dealt with the same issues as to 2007. Because we find no distinction between the underlying facts and the applicable law as to the two cases, we adopt the opinion and holding of M.B.I and "reverse the previously-allowed three hours per day of `additional in-home supports above the live-in rate' and remand for an allowance of six additional in-home support hours per day; and . . . reverse the disallowance of M.B.'s personal emergency response system and artificial tears." M.B., 13 So. 3d at 515. The order under review is otherwise affirmed.
Affirmed in part, reversed in part.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
This copy provided by Leagle, Inc.
| x | |





