IN RE WHITMAN

No. 96-1487.

81 Ohio St.3d 239 (1998)

IN RE WHITMAN.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 11, 1998.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Malone & Ault and Richard R. Malone, for appellant.

Whitman & Hawkins Co., L.P.A., and Jeffrey V. Hawkins, for appellee.


LUNDBERG STRATTON, J.

We are asked to decide whether a party to a dissolution of marriage is entitled to relief from judgment under Civ.R. 60(B) when at the time he or she consented to a separation agreement, he or she was unaware that it contained material omissions, mistakes, and misstatements with regard to property belonging to the couple. We must also decide the effect, if any, of the opposing party's remarriage upon the court's Civ.R. 60(B) analysis...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases