REYNOLDS v. GONZALEZ


798 A.2d 67 (2002)

172 N.J. 266

Frank REYNOLDS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mario D. GONZALEZ, M.D., a licensed physician of the State of New Jersey, Defendant-Respondent, and Meadowlands Hospital Medical Center, a Hospital Corporation of the State of New Jersey, its servants, agents or employees, John Doe and Mary Roe # 1-5 (fictitious names intending to designate nurses and health care professionals who participated in the care, management, post surgical management and care of Plaintiff), and each of them jointly, severally or in the alternative, Defendants.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 11, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas D. Burgess, Wallington, argued the cause for appellant (Cary & Icaza, attorneys; Robert R. Cary, Newark, on the brief).

Judith A. Wahrenberger, Springfield, argued the cause for respondent (Wahrenberger & O'Brien, attorneys).

E. Drew Britcher, Morristown, argued the cause for amicus curiae, Association of Trial Lawyers New Jersey (Britcher, Leone & Roth, attorneys).


The opinion of the Court was delivered by STEIN, J.

In this appeal, plaintiff contends that the Court should eliminate the substantial factor test in increased-risk medical malpractice cases. See Scafidi v. Seiler, 119 N.J. 93, 574 A.2d 398 (1990); Evers v. Dollinger, 95 N.J. 399

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases