1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 101 N.J.
  5. 101 N.J. 27 (1985)
 

STATE v. MATULEWICZ

101 N.J. 27 (1985)

499 A.2d 1363

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STANLEY A. MATULEWICZ, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided November 21, 1985.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John C. Berndt, Assistant Prosecutor, argued the cause for appellant (Joseph A. Falcone, Passaic County Prosecutor, attorney).

George J. Shamy, Jr. argued the cause for respondent (Shamy & Luke, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

The issue raised by the defendant, Stanley A. Matulewicz, focuses upon whether a State Police chemist's laboratory report, identifying a controlled dangerous substance as marijuana, may be admitted as either a "business entry" pursuant to the hearsay exception in Evidence Rule 63(13) or a "report and finding" of a public official consistent with Evidence Rule 63(15)(a). The Appellate Division,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases