IN RE PROBATE OF WILL AND CODICIL OF MACOOL

Nos. A-4697-08T2, A-4734-08T2

3 A.3d 1258 (2010)

416 N.J. Super. 298

In the Matter of the PROBATE OF the Alleged WILL AND CODICIL OF Louise MACOOL, Deceased.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided September 16, 2010.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. King, Jr. , argued the cause for appellant Mary Rescigno in A-4697-08 and respondent in A-4734-08 (Ford, Flower & Hasbrouck, attorneys; Peter B. Garvey , Linwood, on the brief).

Vincent A. Campo argued the cause for appellants Muriel Carolfi and Michael Macool in A-4734-08 and respondents in A-4697-08 (Law Offices of Hoffman DiMuzio , attorneys; Robert J. Wiltsee , Woodbury, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, FUENTES and GILROY.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

In his opening remarks before the trial court, plaintiff's counsel characterized this case as one that "challenges the chancellor." We agree. The facts underlying this case are so uniquely challenging that they have the feel of an academic exercise, designed by a law professor to test the limits of a student's understanding of probate law. But this case is not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases