VIRGINIA M. HERNANDEZ COVINGTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on consideration of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas B. McCoun, III's Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 736), filed on June 30, 2017, recommending that Lucas Lapinski's construed Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. # 727) be denied.
Lapinski filed an objection to the Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 737). As discussed below, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings and recommendations, a district judge may accept, reject or modify the magistrate judge's report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1);
The Report and Recommendation thoroughly and thoughtfully addresses the issues presented and none of the arguments raised in the objection provide a basis for rejecting the Report and Recommendation. After conducting a careful and complete review of the findings, conclusions and recommendations, and giving de novo review, the Court accepts the factual findings and legal conclusions of the Magistrate Judge and the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, it is
(1) The Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 736) is
(2) Lapinski's objection (Doc. # 737) is
(3) Lapinski's construed Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. # 727) is
(4) The Court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith and directs the Clerk to notify the Court of Appeals of this ruling in accordance with Rule 24(a)(4)(B), Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.