FRANLOGIC SCOUT DEVELOPMENT, LLC v. SCOTT HOLDINGS, INC.

Civil Action No. 16-5042.

FRANLOGIC SCOUT DEVELOPMENT, LLC, et al., Petitioners, v. SCOTT HOLDINGS, INC., Respondent.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Cause: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

FRANLOGIC SCOUT DEVELOPMENT, LLC, Petitioner, represented by WILLIAM J. THOMAS , GIANNASCOLI & KENT, P.C..

ED SAMANE, Petitioner, represented by WILLIAM J. THOMAS , GIANNASCOLI & KENT, P.C..

LISA KORNSTEIN, Petitioner, represented by WILLIAM J. THOMAS , GIANNASCOLI & KENT, P.C..

HOWARD SOLOWAY, Petitioner, represented by WILLIAM J. THOMAS , GIANNASCOLI & KENT, P.C..

STEVE PRUITT, Petitioner, represented by WILLIAM J. THOMAS , GIANNASCOLI & KENT, P.C..

SCOTT HOLDINGS, INC., Respondent, represented by JOHN F. O'RIORDAN , O'RIORDAN LAW FIRM.


ORDER

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, District Judge.

AND NOW, this 12th day of July 2017, upon consideration of Petitioners Franlogic Scout Development LLC, Ed Samane, Lisa Kornstein, Howard Soloway, and Steve Pruitts' Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 1), Respondent Scott Holdings, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss the Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 2), Petitioners' Response in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 7), Respondent's Reply (Doc. No. 8), Petitioners' Supplemental Brief (Doc. No. 13), Respondent's Supplemental Brief (Doc. No. 14), arguments made by counsel for the parties at the hearing held on February 7, 2017, and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED. 2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss the Petition to Compel Arbitration (Doc. No. 2) is GRANTED. 3. This case shall be closed for statistical purposes.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases