DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY v. REO INVESTMENT ADVISORS V LLC

Case No. 2:17-cv-00694-JAD-PAL.

DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE OF THE AAMES MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2004-1, Plaintiff, v. REO INVESTMENT ADVISORS V LLC; HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION; and NEVADA ASSOCIATION SERVICES, INC., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Nature of Suit: 290 Real Property: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Plaintiff, represented by Dana Jonathon Nitz , Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Plaintiff, represented by YanXiong Li , WRIGHT FINLAY & ZAK, LLP.

REO Investments Advisors V, LLC, Defendant, represented by Annie J. Kung , Kung & Associates & Georlen K. Spangler , Kung & Brown.

Heritage Estates Homeowners Association, Defendant, represented by Wing Yan Wong , Gordon & Rees, LLP & Brian K. Walters , Gordon & Rees LLP.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE OPPOSITION TO HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS

[First Request]

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff, DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANY, AS INDENTURE TRUSTEE OF THE AAMES MORTGAGE INVESTMENT TRUST 2004-1, (hereinafter "Deutsche Bank" or "Plaintiff"), by and through its attorneys of record, Dana Jonathon Nitz, Esq. and Yanxiong Li, Esq., of the law firm of Wright, Finlay & Zak, LLP and Defendant, HERITAGE ESTATES HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION (hereinafter "HOA" and collectively with "Deutsche Bank" as the "Parties"), by and through its attorneys of record, Wing Y. Wong, Esq. and Brian K. Walters, Esq., of the law firm of Gordon Rees, LLP hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Deutsche Bank to file its Opposition to HOA's Motion to Dismiss ("Motion") up to and including July 19, 2017.

Plaintiff filed its Complaint on March 8, 2017 [ECF No. 1], to which HOA responded by filing a Motion to Dismiss on June 30, 2017 [ECF No. 21]. The current deadline for Plaintiff to file its Opposition to HOA's Motion is July 14, 2017.

Since the HOA filed its Motion, the Parties were engaged in substantive discussions regarding the prospect of staying or dismissing, without prejudice, Plaintiff's claims against the HOA in this matter. Such a resolution would have avoided the need for further briefing by the Parties. Regrettably, these discussions have recently reached an impasse. Plaintiff intends to file a response to HOA's Motion as a result, and Parties are agreeable to allow Plaintiff a short extension of time to adequately address the substantial arguments made in HOA's Motion.

Therefore, good cause exists for this short extension. This is the first request for an extension of time and is not intended to cause delay or prejudice to any party.

ORDER

Based on the foregoing Stipulation by and between the parties, and good cause appearing, IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases