FEATHERSTON v. LAZER SPOT, INC.

Case No. 2:17-cv-01221-APG-GWF.

LEPATRICK FEATHERSTON, and individual, on behalf of himself and all persons similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. LAZER SPOT, INC., a foreign corporation; EMPLOYEE(S)/AGENT(S) DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI-XX, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lepatrick Featherston, Plaintiff, represented by Christian James Gabroy , Gabroy Law Offices.

Lepatrick Featherston, Plaintiff, represented by Kaine M. Messer , Gabroy Law Offices.

Lazer Spot, Inc., Defendant, represented by Aileen E. Cohen , Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC, Brett C. Bartlett , Seyfarth Shaw LLP, pro hac vice, Jeffrey L. Glaser , Seyfarth Shaw LLP, pro hac vice, Katherine Smallwood , Seyfarth Shaw LLP, pro hac vice & Michael C. Mills , Bauman Loewe Witt & Maxwell, PLLC.


STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CIRCULATION OF NOTICE OF THE PENDENCY OF THIS ACTION PURSUANT TO 29 U.S.C. 216(b) AND FOR OTHER RELIEF

GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc. ("Lazer Spot"), and Plaintiff Lepatrick Featherston ("Plaintiff'), by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate and agree that Plaintiff's Motion for Circulation of Notice of the Pendency of this Action Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 216(b) and for Other Relief ("Motion for Conditional Certification") (Doc. No. 16) shall be denied without prejudice. On June 27, 2017, the Court entered the parties' proposed Scheduling Order. (Doc No. 21). Pursuant to the Scheduling Order, the parties will engage in phased discovery and motions practice. Phase 1 will be limited to the application of the Motor Carrier Act exemption to Plaintiff If no Motion for Summary Judgment is filed upon completion of Phase 1, or if resolution of a filed Motion for Summary Judgment results in the case proceeding, Plaintiff may file a Motion for Conditional Certification, including a renewal of his request for equitable tolling of the FLSA statute of limitations. This Stipulation is consistent with this Court's previous ruling in Gaspar v. Supershuttle, 15-cv-02149, Dkt. 33 and Dkt. 40.

Further, as the parties have agreed to such stipulation herein, the parties respectfully request that the hearing currently scheduled for 8/10/2017 at 9:30 am on Plaintiff's Motion, Dkt 16, be vacated pursuant to the terms of this Stipulation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases