1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. DELL FEDERAL SYSTEMS, L.P. v. U.S.
 

DELL FEDERAL SYSTEMS, L.P. v. U.S.

Nos. 17-465C, 17-473C

DELL FEDERAL SYSTEMS, L.P., and BLUE TECH INC., Plaintiffs, v. IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, et al., Plaintiff-Intervenors, THE UNITED STATES, Defendant, and ALPHASIX CORP., et al., Defendant-Intervenors.

United States Court of Federal Claims.

July 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1491
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Nature of Suit: 138 Contract - (Pre Award) Injunctions
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DELL FEDERAL SYSTEMS, L.P., Plaintiff, represented by Michael F. Mason , Hogan Lovells US LLP.

IRON BOW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by James C. Fontana , Depmsey Fontana, PLLC.

GOVSMART, INC., Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Jerry Alfonso Miles , Deale Services, LLC.

IDEAL SYSTEM SOLUTIONS, INC., Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Maria Lisa Panichelli , Cohen, Seglias, et al..

NCS TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Thomas Kenneth David , David, Broady & Donershire.

RED RIVER COMPUTER COMPANY, INC., Intervenor Plaintiff, represented by Joseph Philip Hornyak , Holland & Knight, LLP.

BLUE TECH INC., Consolidated Plaintiff, represented by Michael J. Anstett , Fried Frank.

USA, Defendant, represented by Joseph Edward Ashman , U.S. Department of Justice.

ALPHASIX CORPORATION, Intervenor Defendant, represented by Anthony J. Marchese , O'Riordan Bethel Law Firm, LLP.

HPI FEDERAL, LLC, Intervenor Defendant, represented by Daniel R. Forman , Crowell & Moring LLP.

CDW GOVERNMENT LLC, Intervenor Defendant, represented by David Michael Nadler , Blank Rome LLP.

INSIGHT PUBLIC SECTOR, INC., Intervenor Defendant, represented by Gerald Howard Werfel , Baker Cronogue Tolle & Werfel, LLP.

INTEGRATION TECHNOLGY GROUPS, INC., Intervenor Defendant, represented by William Thomas Welch , McMahon, Welch & Learned.

STERLING COMPUTERS CORPORATION, Intervenor Defendant, represented by Anne Bluth Perry , Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP.

OPINION AND ORDER

Plaintiffs brought this bid protest to challenge the Department of the Army's decision to take corrective action after multiple previous protests had been filed at the Government Accountability Office ("GAO"). The underlying solicitation sought to procure commercial off-the-shelf computer...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases