F5 NETWORKS, INC. v. RADWARE, INC.

Case No. 17-cv-03166-VC.

F5 NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RADWARE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F5 Networks, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina Jordan McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

Radware, Inc., Defendant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL, Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP, Lucas H. Dahlin , McDermott Will Emery LLP & Teri H.P. Nguyen , McDermott Will & Emery LLP.

Radware, LTD., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.

Radware, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LLP & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP, Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

Radware, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.

Radware, LTD., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL, Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP, Lucas H. Dahlin , McDermott Will Emery LLP & Teri H.P. Nguyen , McDermott Will & Emery LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP, Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Colie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP, Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

Radware, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.


SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS

VINCE CHHABRIA, District Judge.

It appears from the discussion at today's telephonic case management conference that F5's motion to strike (Dkt. No. 86) is frivolous. Therefore, F5 and its counsel are ordered to show cause why they should not be sanctioned (under Rule 11, 28 U.S.C. section 1927, or the Court's inherent authority) for this filing. A response to the order to show cause must be filed no later than seven days from this order, and may not exceed 15 pages. A hearing will take place on the order to show cause and on the motion to strike on July 27, 2017 at 10 am.

As discussed at the telephonic case management conference, F5's motion to stay Radware's counterclaims pending IPR (Dkt. No. 101) is scheduled for October 12, 2017 at 10 am. At this hearing, the parties should also be prepared to discuss whether to stay the remainder of the case (or other parts of the case) pending IPR.

F5's motion to dismiss (Dkt. No. 61) and Radware's motion for judgment on the pleadings (Dkt. No. 72) are terminated without prejudice to renewal following the October 12, 2017 hearing.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases