1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F5 NETWORKS, INC. v. RADWARE, INC.
 

F5 NETWORKS, INC. v. RADWARE, INC.

Case No. 17-cv-03166-VC.

F5 NETWORKS, INC., Plaintiff, v. RADWARE, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

July 12, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F5 Networks, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Plaintiff, represented by Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina Jordan McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

Radware, Inc., Defendant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL, Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP, Lucas H. Dahlin , McDermott Will Emery LLP & Teri H.P. Nguyen , McDermott Will & Emery LLP.

Radware, LTD., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.

Radware, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LLP & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP, Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

Radware, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.

Radware, LTD., Counter-claimant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL, Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP, Lucas H. Dahlin , McDermott Will Emery LLP & Teri H.P. Nguyen , McDermott Will & Emery LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP, Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Colie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

F5 Networks, Inc., Counter-claimant, represented by Ramsey M. Al-Salam , Perkins Coie LLP, Antoine M. McNamara , Perkins Coie LLP, Christina J. McCullough , Perkins Coie LLP, Lane Polozola , Perkins Coie LLP, Nathaniel Eli Durrance , Newman & Du Wors LLP, Stevan Richard Stark, Jr. , Perkins Coie LLP, pro hac vice & Victoria Q. Smith , Perkins Coie LLP.

Radware, Inc., Counter-defendant, represented by David B. Edwards , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgarden Fogg & Moore LLP, Fabio Elia Marino , McDermott Will & Emery LLP, pro hac vice, Nitin Gambhir , McDermott Will & Emery LL & Kevin C. Baumgardner , Corr Cronin Michelson Baumgardner Fogg & Moore LLP.

SCHEDULING ORDER AND ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE SANCTIONS

It appears from the discussion at today's telephonic case management conference that F5's motion to strike (Dkt. No. 86) is frivolous. Therefore, F5 and its counsel are ordered to show cause why they should not be sanctioned (under Rule 11, 28 U.S.C....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases