U.S. v. NERSESYAN

Case No. 2:16-CR-00108-GEB.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JOE NERSESYAN, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joe Nersesyan, Defendant, represented by Clyde M. Blackmon , Rothschild, Wishek & Sands, LLP.

USA, Plaintiff, represented by Justin Lee , United States Attorney's Office & Cameron Desmond , United States Attorney's Office.


STIPULATION REGARDIN EXCLUDABLE TIME PERIODS UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT; [PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER

GARLAND E. BURRELL, Jr., Senior District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff United States of America, by and through its counsel of record, and defendant, by and through defendant's counsel of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on July 14, 2017.

2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until July 28, 2017, and to exclude time between July 14, 2017, and July 28, 2017, under Local Code T4.

3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:

a) The government has represented that the discovery associated with this case includes multiple fingerprint analyses reports that were produced on June 29, 2017 and additional firearm inspection and interview reports produced on June 9, 2017. All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection and copying. b) Counsel for defendant desires additional time to review the discovery, to conduct further investigation, including independent fingerprint analysis, and to otherwise prepare for trial. c) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny him/her the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. d) The government does not object to the continuance. e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act. f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of July 14, 2017 to July 28, 2017, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv) [Local Code T4] because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] FINDINGS AND ORDER

The Trial Confirmation Hearing is rescheduled as the parties request and time is excluded as stated.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases