WINKELMAN v. BERRYHILL

Case No. 2:16-cv-01126-AC.

RAY JACHIN WINKELMAN, Plaintiff, v. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.

United States District Court, E.D. California, Sacramento Division.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Nature of Suit: 864 Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ray Jachin Winkelman, Plaintiff, represented by Robert Weems , Weems Law Offices.

Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant, represented by Beatrice Na , Office Of General Counsel, Social Security Administration & Bobbie J. Montoya , United States Attorney's Office.


JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the parties, through their respective counsel of record, that Defendant's time for responding to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment be extended from July 14, 2017 to August 30, 2017. This is Defendant's first request for an extension of time to respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment.

Defendant requests this extension due to her counsel's heavy workload. Defendant's counsel is responsible for an appellate brief for a Social Security case in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, discovery in two personnel-related litigations pending before the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), and over 40 cases in the United States District Courts for the Northern District, Eastern District, Central District, and Southern District of California, and District of Nevada. Defendant's counsel respectfully requests this time to review the Administrative Record, and to evaluate and respond to issues Plaintiff raises in his motion.

The parties further stipulate that all subsequent deadlines shall be extended accordingly.

The parties stipulate in good faith, with no intent to prolong proceedings unduly.

ORDER

APPROVED AND SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases