BROWN v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Case No. 1:17-CV-00670-LJO-JLT.

TERI BROWN, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a SPECTRUM, and JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Nature of Suit: 890 Other Statutory Actions
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Teri Brown, Plaintiff, represented by Adrian R. Bacon , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C..

Teri Brown, Plaintiff, represented by Meghan George , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman & Todd M. Friedman , Law Offices of Todd M. Friedman, P.C..

Charter Communications, Inc., Defendant, represented by Rowena Santos , Thompson Coburn LLP.


(Doc. 7)

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.

This Stipulation is entered into by and between the parties, plaintiff, TERI BROWN ("Plaintiff"), and defendant, CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a SPECTRUM ("Defendant"), through their respective undersigned counsel based upon the following facts:

1. On July 3, 2017, Plaintiff served her Complaint filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, and the deadline by which Defendant is to respond to the Complaint is July 24, 2017;

2. Plaintiff and Defendant (collectively "Parties") agreed to extend the time in which Defendant is to answer, move, or otherwise plead to the Complaint herein from July 24, 2017 to August 21, 2017;

3. No other extensions have been requested or ordered.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, through their respective undersigned counsel that Defendant shall have to and including August 21, 2017 in which to answer, move, or otherwise plead to the Complaint herein.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

As noted in Local Rule 144(a)1, no order of the Court is required related to "an initial stipulation extending time for no more than twenty-eight (28) days to respond to a complaint." However, because the parties submitted the proposed order with their stipulation (Doc. 7), the Court GRANTS that request.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. Counsel SHALL familiarize themselves with the Court's Local Rules.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases