HUCKABEE v. MEDICAL STAFF AT CSATF

Case No. 1:09-cv-00749-DAD-BAM (PC).

ANTHONY CRAIG HUCKABEE, Plaintiff, v. MEDICAL STAFF AT CSATF, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Anthony Craig Huckabee, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Dr. McGuiness, Defendant, represented by Susan Eileen Coleman , Burke, Williams & Sorensen LLP & Kristina Doan Gruenberg , Burke Williams & Sorensen.

Dr. Wu, Defendant, represented by Joanna Breiden Hood , Department of Justice.

RN Jeffreys, Defendant, represented by Joanna Breiden Hood , Department of Justice.

F. Jimenez, Defendant, represented by Joanna Breiden Hood , Department of Justice.

Enenmoh, Defendant, represented by Joanna Breiden Hood , Department of Justice.


ORDER STRIKING PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSES TO DEFENDANTS' ANSWERS (ECF Nos. 225, 226)

BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff Anthony Craig Huckabee ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff's fifth amended complaint against Defendants Wu, McGuinness, Enenmoh, Jeffreys, and Jimenez in their individual capacities for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (ECF Nos. 195, 199.)

On June 15, 2017, Defendant McGuiness answered Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. 212.) On June 19, 2017, Defendants Enenmoh, Jimenez, and Wu answered Plaintiff's complaint. (ECF No. 217.) On July 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed responses to both answers. (ECF Nos. 225, 226.)

In relevant part, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that there shall be a complaint, an answer to a complaint, and, if the court orders one, a reply to an answer. Fed. R. Civ. P. 7(a). The Court has not ordered a reply to Defendants' answers and declines to make such an order.

Accordingly, Plaintiff's responses to Defendants' answers, filed on July 12, 2017, (ECF Nos. 225, 226), are HEREBY STRICKEN from the record.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases