1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. MARQUEZ v. McMAHON
 

MARQUEZ v. McMAHON

Case Nos. 5:14-cv-01196-JGB-DTB, 5:14-cv-01085-JGB-DTB, 5:14-cv-00911-JGB-DTB, 5:15-cv-02513-JGB-DTB, 5:16-cv-00314-JGB-DTB, 5:15-cv-01645-JGB-DTB, 5:14-cv-01753-JGB-DTB, 5:15-cv-02515-JGB-DTB, 5:15-cv-00157-JGB-DTB

ARMANDO MARQUEZ, Plaintiff, v. JOHN McMAHON, SHERIFF OF THE COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SHERRIFF'S DEPARTMENT, COUNTY OF SAN BERNARDINO, CAPTAIN JEFF ROSE, DEPUTY BROCK TEYECHEA, DEPUTY RUSSELL KOPASZ, DEPUTY ROBERT ESCAMILLA, DEPUTY GILL, and DOES 1-10, inclusive, Defendants.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Eastern Division.

July 13, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cause: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other
Source: PACER

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Armando Marquez, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel Christian Sharpe , Law Offices of Vincent Davis and Associates.

John McMahon, Defendant, represented by Dana Alden Fox , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP & Matthew Patrick Harrison , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP.

Jeff Rose, Defendant, represented by Dana Alden Fox , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP & Matthew Patrick Harrison , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP.

Russell Kopasz, Defendant, represented by Matthew Patrick Harrison , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP.

Robert Escamilla, Defendant, represented by Risa Su Christensen , Wagner and Pelayes LLP, Dennis E. Wagner , Wagner and Pelayes LLP & Matthew Patrick Harrison , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP.

Gill, Defendant, represented by Matthew Patrick Harrison , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP.

County of San Bernardino, Defendant, represented by Dana Alden Fox , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP & Matthew Patrick Harrison , Lewis Brisbois Bisgaard and Smith LLP.

ORDER DISMISSING ENTIRE LAWSUIT WITH PREJUDICE

ORDER

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that, in accordance with the Joint Stipulation filed, and in accordance with Rule 41 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:

This Honorable Court Orders that the above...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases