BILDERBACK v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC

No. 2:16-cv-01954-JAD-VCF.

DIANNE BILDERBACK, Plaintiff, v. OCWEN LOAN SERVICING, LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Nature of Suit: 480 Consumer Credit
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dianne Bilderback, Plaintiff, represented by Mitchell D. Gliner , Law Office of Mitchell D. Gliner.

Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Defendant, represented by Kristin A. Schuler-Hintz , McCarthy & Holthus, LLP & Thomas Beckom , McCarthy Holthus LLP.


STIPULATION TO STAY DISCOVERY

[Second Request]

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action on August 17, 2016. On December 20, 2016 the Honorable Magistrate entered his attached Order Granting Limited Stay Of Discovery [#22]. Defendant has not filed an Answer and this Honorable Court has not yet ruled on Defendant's pending January 9, 2017 Motion to Dismiss The First Amended Complaint [#24].

The parties respectfully request that discovery in this action be stayed throughout the pendency of the above-noted motion practice and until twenty (20) days after Defendant files its Answer. This will assist the parties in avoiding unnecessary time and expense related to costly discovery in the event Defendant's Motion is granted. Further, in the event Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is denied, that may provide a basis to renew settlement discussions prior to entering into further discovery.

IT IS SO ORDERED:

ORDER GRANTING LIMITED STAY OF DISCOVERY

[Stipulation and Order Staying Discovery (ECF No. 20)]

The parties filed a Stipulation and Order Staying Discovery (ECF No. 20). The Stay requested by the parties does not set a date certain for lifting the stay and will not be approved in that form.

Good Cause Appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all discovery is stayed in this case until the earlier of twenty (20) days after Defendant files an answer or June 20, 2017;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will not be required to file a proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order until the earlier of twenty (20) days after Defendant files an answer or June 20, 2017;

After June 6, 2017, the parties may file a stipulation to further stay discovery and the filing of a new Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, if the case is still pending and the Defendant has not filed an answer at the time of filing the new stipulation.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases