HANCOCK v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Case No. 2:16-cv-01697-JLR.

JUDITH HANCOCK, Plaintiff, v. AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY; THE BOEING COMPANY EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND WELFARE BENEFIT PLAN (PLAN 503); and EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS COMMITTEE, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington, Seattle.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A. - Employee Benefits
Nature of Suit: 791 Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Judith Hancock, Plaintiff, represented by Melton L. Crawford , LAW OFFICE OF MEL CRAWFORD.

Aetna Life Insurance Company, Defendant, represented by Brittany F. Stevens , GORDON & REES LLP & Sarah N. Turner , GORDON & REES.

The Boeing Company Employee Health and Welfare Benefit Plan (Plan 503), Defendant, represented by Brittany F. Stevens , GORDON & REES LLP & Sarah N. Turner , GORDON & REES.

Employee Benefit Plans Committee, Defendant, represented by Brittany F. Stevens , GORDON & REES LLP & Sarah N. Turner , GORDON & REES.


AGREED MOTION AND ORDER REGARDING USE OF MODEL STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER WITH SLIGHT MODIFICATIONS

JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.

AGREED MOTION

The parties, through their undersigned counsel of record, jointly move this Court to enter the Protective Order attached hereto as Dkt. No. 57-1.

The Protective Order is based on the Western District of Washington's Model Stipulated Protective Order. It has been signed by Plaintiff's counsel and by counsel for Professional Disability Associates, LLC ("PDA"), and concerns documents to be produced by PDA in response to a subpoena duces tecum Plaintiff served on that business. (That subpoena is Dkt. No. 29-5 in this action.) The Order has been modified slightly to reflect that it is an agreement between Plaintiff and a non-party, rather than a party to this action. A redlined copy showing the modifications is attached hereto as Dkt. No. 57-2. Counsel for the parties to this action discussed this matter during an LR 37(a) conference on May 5, 2017.

II. ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' agreed motion, it is so ORDERED. Plaintiff may file the Stipulated Protective Order as that document appears at Dkt. No. 56-1.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases