TALMER BANK AND TRUST v. VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA

Case No. 2:16-cv-01290-APG-CWH.

TALMER BANK AND TRUST, a Michigan state-chartered bank, Plaintiff, v. VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA, a Nevada state-chartered bank, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Nevada.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Breach of Contract
Nature of Suit: 190 Contract: Other
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Talmer Bank and Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Nicole E. Lovelock , Lovelock Hill PLLC.

Talmer Bank and Trust, Plaintiff, represented by Sydney Gambee , Holland & Hart & Joseph G. Went , Holland & Hart LLP.

Valley Bank of Nevada, Defendant, represented by Matthew T. Kneeland , Sylvester & Polednak, Ltd.


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND BRIEFING DEADLINES ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND COUNTERMOTION

ANDREW P. GORDON, District Judge.

STIPULATION

Plaintiff TALMER BANK AND TRUST ("Talmer"), by and through its counsel of the law firm of Holland & Hart, LLP, and Defendant VALLEY BANK OF NEVADA ("Valley"), by and through its counsel of the law firm Sylvester & Polednak, LTD, respectfully submit the following Stipulation and Order to Extend Briefing Deadlines on Motion for Summary Judgment as follows:

1. Talmer filed and served its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) on April 13, 2017.

2. On May 1, 2017, Talmer and Valley filed their Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule on Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 18), extending the deadline for Valley's Opposition to May 18, 2017 and the deadline for Talmer's Reply to June 1, 2017.

3. On May 2, 2017, the Court entered its Order Granting Stipulation to Extend Briefing Deadlines on Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 19).

4. On May 18, 2017, Valley filed and served its Opposition to Talmer's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 20). Also on May 18, 2017, Valley filed and served its Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21).

5. The deadline for Talmer to file and serve its Opposition to Valley's Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21) shall remain June 8, 2017 pursuant to LR 7-2(b).

6. The new deadline for Talmer to file and serve its Reply in support of its Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 16) shall be June 8, 2017 (prior deadline was June 1, 2017).

7. The deadline for Valley to file and serve its Reply in support of its Counter-Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 21) shall remain June 22, 2017 pursuant to LR 7-2(b).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases