SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. COLDICUTT

Case No. 2:17-mc-00068-CAS (AFMx).

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, Applicant, v. ANDREW T.E. COLDICUTT and LAW OFFICE OF ANDREW COLDICUTT, Respondents.

United States District Court, C.D. California.

May 11, 2017.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Cause: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Nature of Suit: 850 Securities / Commodities
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Securities and Exchange Commission, Movant, represented by Lynn M. Dean , US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Securities and Exchange Commission, Movant, represented by Roberto A. Tercero , US Securities and Exchange Commission.

Andrew T.E. Coldicutt, Respondent, represented by Estevan R. Lucero , Lucero Law Firm.

Law Office of Andrew Coldicutt, Respondent, represented by Estevan R. Lucero , Lucero Law Firm.


[PROPOSED] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY AN ORDER COMPELLING COMPLIANCE WITH INVESTIGATIVE SUBPOENAS SHOULD NOT BE ISSUED

The Applicant, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), having filed an Application for an Order to Show Cause and an Application for Order Compelling...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases