In the Interest of Jane DOE, a Minor.
Appeal of Jane Doe.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Submitted November 1, 2010.
Decided December 22, 2011.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Frederick N. Frank , Frank, Gale, Bails, Murcko & Gubinsky, P.C., Pittsburgh, for PG Publishing Co., Morning Call, Inc., Philadelphia Media Network, Inc., PA Newspaper Assoc., Participant.
Witold J. Walczak , American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania, for Petitioner Amicus Curiae, ACLU of Pennsylvania.
Richard E. Connell , Ball, Murren & Connell, Harrisburg, for Respondent Amicus Curiae, Pennsylvania Catholic Conference.
Randall Luke Wenger , Boyle Neblett & Wenger, Camp Hill, for Respondents Amicus Curiae, Independence Law Center and PA Pro-Life Federation & PA Family Institute.
Under prevailing decisions of the United States Supreme Court, the federal Constitution has protected a woman's right to choose to have an abortion before viability and to obtain the abortion without undue governmental interference. Roe v. Wade,410 U.S. 113, 93 S.Ct. 705, 35 L.Ed.2d 147 (1973). The High Court has ruled that a state may require a minor seeking an abortion to obtain the consent...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
