STATE v. GARVIN

No. 96819.

2012 Ohio 179

State of Ohio, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth Garvin, Defendant-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James E. Valentine , 323 Lakeside Avenue, Suite 450, Cleveland, OH 44113, ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT.

William D. Mason , Cuyahoga County Prosecutor, BY: John R. Kosko , Assistant County Prosecutor, The Justice Center, 1200 Ontario Street, 9th Floor, Cleveland, OH 44113, ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE.

Before: Stewart, P.J., Cooney, J., Kilbane, J.


JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION

MELODY J. STEWART, P.J.

{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Kenneth Garvin, appeals from his guilty plea on single counts of sexual battery and gross sexual battery. His sole assignment of error is that the court erred by imposing consecutive sentences for those counts without first determining whether they were allied offenses of similar import. The state concedes the merit of Garvin's assignment of error and asks that we sustain the assigned error and remand for an allied offense hearing and a resentencing.

{¶ 2} Our review of the sentencing confirms the state's concession. We summarily sustain the assignment of error and remand for a hearing at which the court must determine whether the counts of sexual battery and gross sexual imposition are allied offenses of similar import. See State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, ¶ 47.

{¶ 3} This cause is reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

It is ordered that appellant recover of appellee his costs herein taxed.

The court finds there were reasonable grounds for this appeal.

It is ordered that a special mandate be sent to the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas to carry this judgment into execution.

A certified copy of this entry shall constitute the mandate pursuant to Rule 27 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

Colleen Conway Cooney, J., AND Mary Eileen Kilbane, J., Concur.


Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases