The trial court properly declined to entertain expert evidence proffered by plaintiff seeking to establish that the routing and filling of cracks in the concrete slabs located in the parking garage constituted non-structural repairs that, under the parties' lease, were defendant's responsibility. This testimony was precluded by the doctrine of law of the case because the motion court, and this Court on a prior appeal (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
