1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.3d
  4. 52 A.3d
  5. 52 A.3d 1064 (2012)
 

BUCHANAN v. LEONARD

Docket No. A-2243-11T4.

52 A.3d 1064 (2012)

428 N.J. Super. 277

William C. BUCHANAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jeffrey LEONARD, Esq. and Morgan, Melhuish, Monaghan, Arvidson, Abrutyn & Lisowski, Esqs., a Partnership, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 9, 2012.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary E. Stern , Hackensack, argued the cause for appellant.

Marshall D. Bilder argued the cause for respondents (Sterns & Weinroth, attorneys; Mr. Bilder , of counsel; Mr. Bilder , Jason S. Feinstein , and David P. Skand , Trenton, on the brief).

Before Judges REISNER, YANNOTTI and HOFFMAN.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

YANNOTTI, J.A.D.

Plaintiff William C. Buchanan (Buchanan) appeals from an order entered by the Law Division on December 16, 2011, which granted a motion by defendants Jeffrey Leonard (Leonard) and Morgan, Melhuish, Arbrutsyn (Morgan Melhuish)1 for summary judgment and dismissed Buchanan's complaint with prejudice. For the reasons that follow, we affirm in part, reverse

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases