CALLWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. AT & T MOBILITY

Civil Action No. 12-1701-RGA, Civil Action No. 12-1704-RGA, Civil Action No. 12-1788-RGA.

207 F.Supp.3d 405 (2016)

CALLWAVE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AT & T MOBILITY, LCC and Google Inc., Defendants. Callwave Communications, LLC, Plaintiff, v. Verizon Services Corp., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless and Google Inc., Defendants. Callwave Communications, LLC, Plaintiff, v. AT &T Mobility, LLC, Blackberry Ltd. and Blackberry Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Delaware.

Signed September 15, 2016.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Cause: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Nature of Suit: 830 Patent
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward D. Johnson, Esq. , James G. McMillan, III, Esq. , PEPPER HAMILTON LLP, Wilmington, DE; William D. Belanger, Esq. , Noah V. Malgeri, Esq. , Suparna Datta, Esq. , Christopher M. Boundy, Esq. , Leah R. McCoy, Esq. , L. Andrew Tseng, Esq. , PEPPER HAMILTON LLP, Boston, MA; Gregory S. Bishop, Esq. , Charles F. Koch, Esq. , PEPPER HAMILTON LLP, Redwood City, CA., Attorneys for Plaintiff Callwave Communications LLC.

Jack B. Blumenfeld, Esq. , Paul Saindon, Esq. , MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, DE; Mark C. Scarsi, Esq. , Philip Chen, Esq. , Ashlee N. Lin, Esq. , Dan Nguyen, Esq. , MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP, Los Angeles, CA; Christopher J. Gaspar, Esq. , Nathaniel Browand, Esq. , MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP, New York, NY., Attorneys for Defendant Google, Inc.

Benjamin J. Schladweiler, Esq. , ROSS ARONSTAM & MORITZ LLP, Wilmington, DE; Edward A. Pennington, Esq. , Sid V. Pandit, Esq. , Stephanie D. Scruggs, Esq , SMITH, GAMBRELL & RUSSELL, LLP, Washington, D.C., Attorneys for Defendants Verizon Services Corp. and Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless.

Colm F. Connolly, Esq. , Jody C. Barillare, Esq. ; MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Wilmington, DE; Eric Kraeutler, Esq. , John V. Gorman, Esq. , Andrew C. Whitney, Esq. , Squire J. Servance, Esq. , MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP, Philadelphia, PA., Attorneys for Defendants Blackberry Corp. and Blackberry Ltd.


MEMORANDUM OPINION

Presently before the Court in these related cases are the Defendants' renewed motions for judgment on the pleadings that the asserted claims of the '970 patent are invalid under § 101. (C.A. No. 12-1701-RGA, D.I. 439; C.A. No. 12-1704-RGA, D.I. 419; CA. No. 12-1788-RGA, D.I. 249).

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases