OUACHITA WATCH LEAGUE v. HENRY

No. 4:11CV00425 JLH.

OUACHITA WATCH LEAGUE; NEWTON COUNTY WILDLIFE ASSOCIATION; SHAWN PORTER; G. THOMAS MCKINNEY; DAVID REAGAN; SUSAN GATELEY; ROBERT B. LEFLAR and SARAH MAY LEFLAR, individually and as natural parents and guardians of SARAH HELEN LEFLAR, a minor; JOHN ISON; KIMBERLY ISON; BILLY LINDSEY; CAROL LINDSEY; JAMES MITCHELL; RUTH MITCHELL; and JOHN LAWRENCE POFF, Plaintiffs, v. JUDITH L. HENRY, Forest Supervisor, Ozark-St. Francis National Forests; UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE; DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, Bureau of Land Management; DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District; and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division.

February 3, 2012.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ouachita Watch League, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Newton County Wildlife Association, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Shawn Porter, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

G Thomas McKinney, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

David Reagan, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Susan Gateley, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Robert B Leflar, individually and as natural parent and guardian of Sarah Helen Leflar, a minor other Sarah Helen Leflar, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Sarah May Leflar, individually and as natural parent and guardian of Sarah Helen Leflar, a minor, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Kimberly Ison, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

John Ison, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Billy Lindsey, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Carol Lindsey, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

James Mitchell, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Ruth Mitchell, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

John Lawrence Poff, Plaintiff, represented by Richard H. Mays , Mays & White, PLLC.

Judith L Henry, Forest Supervisor, Ozark-St. Francis National Forests, Defendant, represented by Ruth Ann Storey , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

Judith L Henry, Forest Supervisor, Ozark-St. Francis National Forests, Defendant, represented by Tyler G. Welti , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

United States Forest Service, Defendant, represented by Ruth Ann Storey , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

United States Forest Service, Defendant, represented by Tyler G. Welti , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

Department of Agriculture, Defendant, represented by Ruth Ann Storey , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

Department of Agriculture, Defendant, represented by Tyler G. Welti , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

Department of Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Defendant,represented by Ruth Ann Storey , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

Department of Interior, Defendant, represented by Tyler G. Welti , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

Department of Defense, United States Army Corps of Engineers, Little Rock District, Defendant,represented by Ruth Ann Storey , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

Department of Defense, Defendant, represented by Tyler G. Welti , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

United States Department of the Army, Defendant, represented by Ruth Ann Storey , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.

United States Department of the Army, Defendant, represented by Tyler G. Welti , U. S. Department of Justice — Environment & Natural Resource.


ORDER

J. LEON HOLMES, District Judge.

The Court has reviewed the Rule 26(f) reports submitted by the parties, as well as the plaintiffs' motion to compel filing of the administrative record. It appears that the parties agree that this action is brought under the authority of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701 et seq., and that review is generally limited to the administrative record. Nevertheless, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases