ORGANIK KIMYA, SAN. VE TIC. A.S. v. ITC

2015-1774 2015-1833.

848 F.3d 994 (2017)

ORGANIK KIMYA, SAN. VE TIC. A.S., Organik Kimya Netherlands B.V., Organik Kimya US, Inc., Appellants v. INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION, Appellee Rohm and Haas Company, Rohm and Haas Chemicals LLC, Dow Chemical Company, Intervenors.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

Decided: February 15, 2017.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

CATHERINE EMILY STETSON , Hogan Lovells US LLP, Washington, DC, argued for appellants. Also represented by JOHN ROBERT ROBERTSON , BENJAMIN HOLT.

SIDNEY A. ROSENZWEIG , Office of the General Counsel, United States International Trade Commission, Washington, DC, argued for appellee. Also represented by DOMINIC L. BIANCHI , WAYNE W. HERRINGTON.

RAYMOND N. NIMROD , Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP, New York, NY, argued for intervenors. Also represented by WILLIAM ADAMS , JAMES BAKER ; S. ALEX LASHER , PAUL F. BRINKMAN , Washington, DC; CHARLES KRAMER VERHOEVEN , San Francisco, CA.

Before Lourie, Mayer, and O'Malley, Circuit Judges.


Organik Kimya San. ve Tic., A.Ş., Organik Kimya Netherlands B.V., and Organik Kimya US, Inc. (collectively, "Organik Kimya") appeal from the International Trade Commission's ("the Commission" or "ITC")1 decision imposing default judgment sanctions for spoliation of evidence and entering...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases