MEDITZ v. CITY OF NEWARK

No. 10-2442.

658 F.3d 364 (2011)

Gregory MEDITZ, Appellant v. CITY OF NEWARK; Does 1-10.

United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

Filed: September 28, 2011.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory Meditz , (argued), East Rutherford, NJ, Appellant, pro se.

Gary S. Lipshutz, Esquire , Emelia Perez, Esquire , (argued), City of Newark, Department of Law, Newark, NJ, for Appellee City of Newark.

Before: SLOVITER, GREENAWAY, JR., and ROTH, Circuit Judges.


OPINION

GREENAWAY, JR., Circuit Judge.

Gregory Meditz ("Meditz"), an attorney proceeding pro se, appeals from the District Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Newark ("Newark") on his claim of disparate impact and his motion to strike1 an exhibit attached to Newark's reply brief. Meditz alleges that the residency requirement adopted by Newark for its non-uniformed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases