1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. FAUSTINO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA
 

FAUSTINO v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA

No. 1 CA-IC 16-0071.

EDGAR FAUSTINO, Petitioner, v. THE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, KEITH & SHARMA MULQUEEN, Respondent Employers, SPECIAL FUND DIVISION/NO INSURANCE SECTION, Respondent Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One.

June 15, 2017.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edgar Faustino, Phoenix, Petitioner.

Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, By Jason M. Porter , Counsel for Respondent Industrial Commission of Arizona.

Welsh Law Group, PLC, Phoenix, By Kenneth W. Welsh, Jr. , Keely Verstegen , Counsel for Respondent Employers.

ICA Special Fund Division/No Insurance Section, Phoenix, By Afshan Peimani , Counsel for Respondent Party in Interest.

Judge Lawrence F. Winthrop delivered the decision of the Court, in which Presiding Judge Samuel A. Thumma and Judge James P. Beene joined.

NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

MEMORANDUM DECISION

¶1 This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona ("ICA") award and decision upon review...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases