1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. RAKHSHAN v. WHATCOM COUNTY
 

RAKHSHAN v. WHATCOM COUNTY

No. 61697-8-I.

ANDREW KAMIER RAKHSHAN, Appellant, v. WHATCOM COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

Filed: April 27, 2009.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Counsel for Appellant(s), Andrew Rakhshan (Appearing Pro Se), 3105 1077 West Cordova, Vancouver, BC, V6C2C6.

Counsel for Respondent(s), Randall Joseph Watts, Attorney at Law, County Courthouse Floor 2, 311 Grand Ave, Bellingham, WA, 98225-4048.

UNPUBLISHED

COX, J.

A thief has no right to possess stolen property.1 Here, because the evidence submitted in opposition to Whatcom County's motion for summary judgment is "too incredible to be believed," Andrew Rakhshan has failed in his burden to show there are any genuine issues of material fact.2 Whatcom County is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We affirm the dismissal with prejudice...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases