THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCARC.
LouShonda Myers appeals an order from the circuit court dismissing her pleading titled "Administrative Notice/Coram Nobis." Myers argues the circuit court erred in dismissing her motion and denied her due process. We construe the "Administrative Notice/Coram Nobis" document as a post-trial motion because Myers stated the purpose of the "Administrative Notice/Coram Nobis" was to "correct the judgment and/or order of . . . contempt." The circuit court did not err in dismissing this motion. First, we note the doctrine of "Coram Nobis" was abolished in South Carolina. See Rule 60(b), SCRCP ("Writs of coram nobis, coram vobis, audita querela, and bills of review and bills in the nature of a bill of review, are abolished, and the procedure for obtaining any relief from a judgment shall be by motion as prescribed in these rules or by an independent action."). Furthermore, any post-trial motion must be made within ten days from the imposition of a sentence. See Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP ("[P]ost-trial motions shall be made within ten (10) days after the imposition of the sentence."). Accordingly, we affirm