The motion court correctly determined that the wife did not waive pendente lite relief. While, in the parties' 2005 postnuptial agreement, the husband explicitly waived his right "to permanent or temporary maintenance ... or other permanent or temporary support," the wife's waiver provision does not contain the same language, and does not clearly reflect the parties' intent that she waive any temporary relief (see Lennox v Weberman,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.