PEOPLE v. RUIZ

9654C/12, 2616, 2615.

146 A.D.3d 417 (2017)

2017 NY Slip Op 00022

43 N.Y.S.3d 743

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. RANDY U. RUIZ, Also Known as VLADIMIR RUIZ, Appellant.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided January 3, 2017.


The informations were facially sufficient because they established by direct and circumstantial non-hearsay evidence every element of the offense of making graffiti (see CPL 100.40 [1]; People v Kalin, 12 N.Y.3d 225 [2009]; People v Borrero, 26 N.Y.2d 430 [1970]). The factual allegations gave defendant enough notice to prepare a defense and were sufficiently detailed to prevent him...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases