SELDON v. SPINNELL

Nos. 7798, 107264/09.

95 A.D.3d 779 (2012)

945 N.Y.S.2d 666

2012 NY Slip Op 4219

PHILIP SELDON, Appellant, v. ANDREW SPINNELL, Respondent.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.

Decided May 31, 2012.


Plaintiff is correct that the court should not have dismissed the first through eighth, tenth, and eleventh causes of action based on res judicata and collateral estoppel. However, we affirm on other grounds raised by defendant below (see Matter of American Dental Coop. v Attorney-General of State of N.Y., 127 A.D.2d 274, 279 n 3 [1987]).

All of the plaintiff's Judiciary Law § 487 claims (the first through tenth causes...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases