Based on the evidence presented, appellant's motion to suppress the physical evidence and his statements should have been granted. Appellant was seized when he exited the store and complied with the officer's order to stop. It is apparent that appellant was not free to leave (see People v Bora,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.