The information charging defendant with harassment in the second degree was facially sufficient (CPL 100.40). The information set out that defendant approached the victim and stated, "[W]hat happened before ain't over and I'm going to finish what I started." The information also stated that the victim had a valid order of protection against defendant, which provided proof that "tend[ed] to support the charges" (CPL 100.15 [3]; cf. People v Todaro,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. VEGA
Nos. 7786, 43715C/09.
95 A.D.3d 773 (2012)
945 N.Y.S.2d 288
2012 NY Slip Op 4213
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, Respondent, v. EMILY VEGA, Appellant.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Decided May 31, 2012.
Decided May 31, 2012.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
