Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the sentencing court, during its inquiry into allegations that he violated the conditions of his plea and of his release under the judicial diversion program (see CPL art 216), deprived him of his right to due process when it relied upon unsworn testimony.
Contrary to the People's contention, the defendant did not validly waive his right to appeal (see People v Bradshaw,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.