Supreme Court properly found that the parties' competing accounts raised multiple issues of fact precluding summary judgment.
Plaintiff did not offer any new or additional facts that would have changed the prior determination denying summary judgment. Therefore, the motion was, in essence, one to reargue, the denial of which is not appealable (see e.g. Prime Income Asset Mgt., Inc. v American Real Estate Holdings L.P.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.