MATISON v. LISNYANSKY

DOCKET NO. A-5656-13T2

129 A.3d 1082 (2016)

443 N.J. Super. 549

Yvietta MATISON, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Mark LISNYANSKY, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 13, 2016.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott Adam Laterra argued the cause for appellant (Laterra & Hodge, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Laterra and Jeffrey B. Hodge, Hackensack, on the brief).

Bruce J. Ackerman argued the cause for respondent (Pashman Stein, PC, attorneys; Mr. Ackerman, Hackensack, Kamilla B. Rodrigues, and Tadd J. Yearing, on the brief).

Before Judges FUENTES, KOBLITZ and GILSON.


The opinion of the court was delivered by

We dismiss this appeal based on the legal doctrine of fugitive disentitlement. A father may not obtain the protection of our judicial system to appeal a palimony and custody default judgment while he remains outside of the country avoiding arrest on an outstanding child-support bench...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases