1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. PIERIDES v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY
 

PIERIDES v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY

No. A-2783-08T1.

NICOLE PIERIDES (A MINOR) and GEORGE and IRENE PIERIDES AS HER PARENTS/LEGAL GUARDIANS and INDIVIDUALLY, Plaintiffs-Respondents, v. GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 19, 2010.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Patricia L. Dee argued the cause for appellant (Capehart & Scatchard, P.A., attorneys; Robert A. Hicken, of counsel; Ms. Dee, on the brief).

David K. Chazen argued the cause for respondent (Chazen & Chazen, LLC, attorneys; Mr. Chazen, on the brief).

Before Judges Fisher, Sapp-Peterson and Espinosa.

PER CURIAM.

Defendant GEICO (Government Employees Insurance Company) appeals from an order that granted summary judgment to plaintiffs and denied its motion for summary judgment. The order resulted in the reformation of a New York automobile insurance policy issued to plaintiffs, who are New Jersey residents, to increase the amount of coverage provided to $250,000 in personal injury protection (PIP) benefits and $300,000 in uninsured motorist (UM) coverage. We reverse...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases