DOE v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Docket Nos. 152406, 152435. COA Nos. 321756, 321013.

876 N.W.2d 570 (2016)

John DOE 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, and John Doe 7, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Governor of the State of Michigan, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Former Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Chief Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Warden of Carson City Correctional Facility, Warden of Charles Egeler Reception and Guidance Center, Warden of Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Warden of Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Warden of Thumb Correctional Facility, Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility, Warden of Marquette Branch Prison, and Warden of Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellees. John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3, John Doe 4, John Doe 5, John Doe 6, and John Doe 7, on behalf of themselves and a class of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Department of Corrections, Governor of the State of Michigan, Director of Michigan Department of Corrections, Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Former Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Chief Deputy Director of MDOC Correctional Facilities Administration, Warden of Carson City Correctional Facility, Warden of Charles Egeler Reception and Guidance Center, Warden of Earnest C. Brooks Correctional Facility, Warden of Gus Harrison Correctional Facility, Warden of Richard A. Handlon Correctional Facility, Warden of Oaks Correctional Facility, Warden of Thumb Correctional Facility, Warden of Chippewa Correctional Facility, Warden of Marquette Branch Prison, and Warden of Bellamy Creek Correctional Facility, Defendants-Appellees.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

March 30, 2016.


Order

On order of the Court, the applications for leave to appeal the August 25, 2015 judgment of the Court of Appeals are considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE that part of the Court of Appeals opinion considering whether the defendants were precluded, under principles of collateral estoppel, from arguing that the 1999 amendment to the Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2301(b), is constitutional and whether the 1999...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases