KARIMOV v. OBK CENTER CORP

Case No. 17-20314-CIV-GAYLES/OTAZO-REYES.

FARHOD KARIMOV, NASIBA JUMAEVA, UGILOY JUMAEVA, AND ZARIF KHURSANDOV, Plaintiffs, v. OBK CENTER CORP d/b/a Bahor Restaurant, a Florida Corporation, and IRINA ELIUTINA. individually, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Florida.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Cause: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Farhod Karimov, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel T. Feld , Daniel T Feld P.A..

Farhod Karimov, Plaintiff, represented by Isaac Jackie Mamane , Mamane Law LLC.

Nasiba Jumaeva, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel T. Feld , Daniel T Feld P.A. & Isaac Jackie Mamane , Mamane Law LLC.

Ugiloy Jumaeva, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel T. Feld , Daniel T Feld P.A. & Isaac Jackie Mamane , Mamane Law LLC.

Zarif Khursandov, Plaintiff, represented by Daniel T. Feld , Daniel T Feld P.A. & Isaac Jackie Mamane , Mamane Law LLC.

OBK Center Corporation, Defendant, represented by Ruben Martin Saenz , Saenz & Anderson, PLLC.

Irina Eliutina, Defendant, represented by Ruben Martin Saenz , Saenz & Anderson, PLLC.


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ALICIA M. OTAZO-REYES, Magistrate Judge.

THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Descendants OBK Center Cop oration and Irina Eliutina's ("Defendants") Motion to Dismiss or Stay Proceedings and to Compel Arbitration (hereafter, "Motion to Dismiss" and "Motion to Stay") [D.E. 16]. This matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 by the Honorable Darrin P. Gayles, United States District Judge [D.E. 23]. The undersigned held a hearing on this matter on May 26, 2017.

Plaintiffs argue that Defendants have waived their right to compel arbitration by participating in this litigation. See Response [D.E. 26]. However, the only activity in which Defendants have engaged is participating in mediation, which does not rise to the level of waiver. See Ivax Corp. v. B. Braun of Am., Inc., 286 F.3d 1309, 1316 (11th Cir.2002) ("[W]aiver occurs when a party seeking arbitration substantially participates in litigation to a point inconsistent with an intent to arbitrate." (citation omitted)). To ensure that Plaintiffs' FLSA rights are preserved, the undersigned recommends a stay of the case rather than dismissal. Therefore, it is

RESPECTFULLY RECOMMENDED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss be DENIED, Defendants' Motion to Stay be GRANTED and the parties be DIRECTED to proceed to arbitration.1

Pursuant to Local Magistrate Judge Rule 4(b), the parties have fourteen days from the date of this Report and Recommendation to file written objections, if any, with the Honorable Darrin P. Gayles. Failure to timely file objections shall bar the parties from attacking on appeal the factual findings contained herein. See Resolution Tr. Cop. v. Hallmark Builders, Inc.,996 F.2d 1144, 1149 (11th Cir. 1993). Further, "failure to object in accordance with the provisions of (28 U.S.C.) § 636(b)(1) waives the right to challenge on appeal the district court's order based on unobjected-to factual and legal conclusions." See 11th Cir. R.3-1 (I.O.P.-3).

FootNotes


1. Plaintiffs requested reimbursement of their mediation fees in their Response. However, that request is DENIED.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases