THOMPSON v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC

Case No. 17-cv-02864-DMR.

BRADFIELD THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

Editors Note
Applicable Law: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Cause: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal - Foreclosure
Nature of Suit: 220 Real Property: Foreclosure
Source: PACER


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bradfield Thompson, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

Nationstar Mortgage LLC, Defendant, represented by Adam Andrew Vukovic , Severson & Werson, Mary Kate Sullivan , Severson & Werson & Laszlo Ladi, Jr. , Severson and Werson.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

DONNA M. RYU, Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Nationstar Mortgage LLC filed a motion to dismiss on May 24, 2017. Currently, the motion is set for a court hearing on June 29, 2017. Plaintiff Bradfield Thompson is pursuing this action without legal representation. According to the local court rules, Plaintiff should have filed any brief in opposition to Defendant's motion by June 7, 2017. See Civ. L.R. 7-3(a). The court has received no such opposition.

The court ORDERS Plaintiff to respond by June 22, 2017 and explain in writing his failure to respond to the motion. In addition, Plaintiff must simultaneously (1) submit his opposition to the court or (2) file a statement of non-opposition to the motion. This order to show cause does not indicate that the court will necessarily accept Plaintiff's late submission. If Plaintiff does not respond by June 22, 2017, Defendant's motion may be granted or the case may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Additionally, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the undersigned cannot decide Defendant's motion unless all parties consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff has not yet filed a consent or declination to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. Plaintiff shall complete the attached form documenting either consent or request for reassignment and file it with the court by June 22, 2017. Plaintiff is free to withhold consent to proceed before a Magistrate Judge without adverse substantive consequences. Plaintiff shall also supply his telephone number when he files the attached form.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CONSENT OR DECLINATION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE JURISDICTION

INSTRUCTIONS: Please indicate below by checking one of the two boxes whether you (if you are the party) or the party you represent (if you are an attorney in the case) choose(s) to consent or decline magistrate judge jurisdiction in this matter. Sign this form below your selection.

( ) Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I voluntarily consent to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment. I understand that appeal from the judgment shall be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.

OR

( ) Decline Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c), I decline to have a United States magistrate judge conduct all further proceedings in this case and I hereby request that this case be reassigned to a United States district judge.

DATE: NAME:___________________ COUNSEL FOR: (OR "PRO SE:) ________________________ Signature

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases